ozone
- 121
- 0
Prove that
[itex]x \frac{d}{dx} [\delta (x)] = -\delta (x)[/itex]
this is problem 1.45 out of griffiths book by the way.
I attempted to use integration by parts as suggest by griffiths using [itex]f = x , g' = \frac{d}{dx}[/itex]
This yields [itex]x [\delta (x)] - \int \delta (x)dx[/itex]
next I tried taking the derivative of both sides so that I would get my original
[itex]x \frac{d}{dx} [\delta (x)] = x \frac{d}{dx}[\delta (x)][/itex]
and so I'm back where I started. I have also tried using a definite integral so that
[itex]\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }x \frac{d}{dx}[\delta (x)] \text{dx} = \int_{-\infty }^{\infty } x[\delta (x)] \, dx - \int_{-\infty }^{\infty } [\delta (x)] \, dx[/itex]
but we know that [itex]\int_{-\infty }^{\infty } x[\delta (x)] \, dx = 0[/itex] so our equation simplifies.
However this didn't get me any closer to solving the problem either.
I also have the second part of the problem regarding the step function which is defined as
[itex]\theta (x) <br /> \begin{array}{ll}<br /> \{ & <br /> \begin{array}{ll}<br /> 1 & x>0 \\<br /> 0 & x\leq 0 \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \\<br /> \end{array}[/itex] Show that [itex]\frac{d}{dx}\theta (x) =\delta (x)[/itex]
This something I can grasp by stating that
[itex] \frac{\Delta \theta }{\text{$\Delta $x}}(x=0 )\longrightarrow 1/0, \text{ as } \text{$\Delta $x}\longrightarrow 0.[/itex]
which is clearly an undefined(or infinite) slope, and at every other point on this graph the derivative is going to be 0. However I want to know if this is sufficiently rigorous, and if it isn't what a step in the right direction might be.
[itex]x \frac{d}{dx} [\delta (x)] = -\delta (x)[/itex]
this is problem 1.45 out of griffiths book by the way.
Homework Equations
I attempted to use integration by parts as suggest by griffiths using [itex]f = x , g' = \frac{d}{dx}[/itex]
This yields [itex]x [\delta (x)] - \int \delta (x)dx[/itex]
next I tried taking the derivative of both sides so that I would get my original
[itex]x \frac{d}{dx} [\delta (x)] = x \frac{d}{dx}[\delta (x)][/itex]
and so I'm back where I started. I have also tried using a definite integral so that
[itex]\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }x \frac{d}{dx}[\delta (x)] \text{dx} = \int_{-\infty }^{\infty } x[\delta (x)] \, dx - \int_{-\infty }^{\infty } [\delta (x)] \, dx[/itex]
but we know that [itex]\int_{-\infty }^{\infty } x[\delta (x)] \, dx = 0[/itex] so our equation simplifies.
However this didn't get me any closer to solving the problem either.
I also have the second part of the problem regarding the step function which is defined as
[itex]\theta (x) <br /> \begin{array}{ll}<br /> \{ & <br /> \begin{array}{ll}<br /> 1 & x>0 \\<br /> 0 & x\leq 0 \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \\<br /> \end{array}[/itex] Show that [itex]\frac{d}{dx}\theta (x) =\delta (x)[/itex]
This something I can grasp by stating that
[itex] \frac{\Delta \theta }{\text{$\Delta $x}}(x=0 )\longrightarrow 1/0, \text{ as } \text{$\Delta $x}\longrightarrow 0.[/itex]
which is clearly an undefined(or infinite) slope, and at every other point on this graph the derivative is going to be 0. However I want to know if this is sufficiently rigorous, and if it isn't what a step in the right direction might be.