Proof involving quantifiers and rationality/irrationality

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oxygenate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that for every rational number z, there exist irrational numbers x and y such that x + y = z. Participants clarify that the sum of two irrational numbers does not necessarily yield a rational number, countering a common misconception. A suggested approach involves defining x and y in relation to z, specifically using x = z/2 - a and y = z/2 + a, where a is an irrational number. The proof hinges on demonstrating that if y were rational, it would lead to a contradiction regarding the irrationality of x. Ultimately, the conclusion affirms the validity of the statement, confirming the existence of such irrational numbers for any rational z.
Oxygenate
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have no idea how to begin this proof.

Homework Statement


Prove that for every rational number z, there exist irrational numbers x and y such that x + y = z.

The Attempt at a Solution


I can't think of even a way to start this proof...it's just quite obvious that the sum of two irrational numbers will equal a rational number, somehow... Please give me some pointers to start this proof with.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"it's just quite obvious that the sum of two irrational numbers will equal a rational number" that, which is the statement converse of what you are asked, is not obvious and not true in general.

For the problem, you do know of a rational number A and an irrational x one that is less than it. Can you prove that (A - x) is also irrational?

Then you can do it for any pair of rationals.
 
Okay, so suppose A is irrational number. Then let x = 1/2z – a. And let y = 1/2z + a. Then x + y = z, and x and y are irrational.
 
Oxygenate said:
Okay, so suppose A is irrational number. Then let x = 1/2z – a. And let y = 1/2z + a. Then x + y = z, and x and y are irrational.

Yes, understand you mean x = z/2 – a. And let y = z/2 + a

But you have to prove explicitly that if z is irrational, so is z/2 + a etc.
 
Okay, so:

Let y = z - x. Then suppose y is rational, then m/n - x = a/b, in which case x = m/n - a/b = (mb - na) / (nb), which is a rational number. But this is a contradiction to the fact that x is an irrational number. Thus the statement (for every rational number z, there exist irrational numbers x and y such that x + y = z) is true.

I essentially just took your idea and developed it. Thanks for your help. :)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K