Proof of adding powers (real analysis)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the equation \( b^{r+s} = b^r b^s \) where \( r \) and \( s \) are rational numbers. The subject area is real analysis, specifically focusing on properties of exponents and the field axioms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use the field axiom of multiplicative associativity to justify the proof. Some participants question whether this approach is sufficient or if additional steps are necessary. Others explore how to represent rational numbers in terms of integers.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, discussing the representation of rational numbers and the application of relevant equations. There is a sense of uncertainty regarding the completeness of the original poster's proof, with some seeking further clarification on necessary steps.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of using integer representations for rational numbers and the constraints of the problem, such as ensuring that denominators are not zero. There is an ongoing exploration of how to apply the axioms and properties listed in the original post.

EV33
Messages
192
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that br+s=brbs if r and s are rational.

Homework Equations



So far we know the basic field axioms and a a few other things related to powers.
1.) For every real x>0 and every integer n>0 there is one and only one positive real y such that yn=x
2.) if a and b are positive real numbers and n is a positive integer, then (ab)1/n=a1/nb1/n
3.)(ba)b=bab

The Attempt at a Solution



When I look at this problem I don't see any way to use the three facts above. The first thing that jumps at me is the field axiom of multiplicative associativity. So for me I see the proof as going as such.

Asssume r and s are rational. br+s=brbs due to multiplicative associativity. (QED)


Is the proof this simple or am I missing something?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Any help would be appreciated.
 
How can you represent a rational number r?
 
I could say that r=m/n, s=u/v where m,n,u, and v are all integers and both n and v are not equal to zero. From here I still have the same problem though. I don't have any ideas for any inbetween steps. All I see is a simple regrouping ( associativity). Is there more to than that or is it really this simple?
 
EV33 said:
I could say that r=m/n, s=u/v where m,n,u, and v are all integers and both n and v are not equal to zero.
OK, that's a start.

The right side of the equation you're trying to prove is brbs. Use the representations above of r and s, and #2 and #3 in your list of relevant equations.
EV33 said:
From here I still have the same problem though. I don't have any ideas for any inbetween steps. All I see is a simple regrouping ( associativity). Is there more to than that or is it really this simple?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K