Proof of F^2_n + F^2_(n+1) = F_(2n+1) for n>=1

  • Thread starter Thread starter StellaLuna
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
StellaLuna
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Could anyone help me with the following proof?

F^2_n + F^2_(n+1) = F_(2n+1) for ngreater than or equal to 1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think a good technique would be to use induction (I don't know if it actually works, I haven't done the proof).

You first consider a base case, in this case it would be n = 1. Check to see that for this the formula works.

Then comes the inductive step. Assume that this formula works for n =k, and then prove that it works for n = k+1.

Then you're done. The reason this proof works is that truth for n=1 implies truth for n=2, and then n=3, and so on infinitely, so the formula would work for all n.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top