Proof of Identity: $\phi(P+Q)=\int_{\partial D}\phi \nabla \phi \cdot \n \ds$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tony11235
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Proof
Tony11235
Messages
254
Reaction score
0
Prove the identity \int_{\partial D}\phi \nabla \phi \cdot \n \ds = \int \int_{D} (\phi \nabla^2 \phi + \nabla \phi \cdot \nabla \phi) \dA
Can I just let \phi be equal to P + Q, substitute into the left side, and try to derive the right side? This is a weird looking identity by the way.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Its actually quite easy, without any vector calculus needed.
(f*gx)x= fx*gx + f*gxx

if you sum these up for y and z derivatives, you will get

Div[f*del(g)] = del(f) dot del(g) + f*del^2(g)

integrate both sides and use divergence theorem.

I apologize for having to write div for divergence, dot for dot product and del for the del operator, but i don't know how to do those fancy fonts.
 
So basically let F be equal to \phi \nabla \phi, then \nabla \cdot F is equal to (\phi \nabla^2 \phi + \nabla \phi \cdot \nabla \phi). What do you know it's the divergence theorem!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top