- #1
TaliskerBA
- 26
- 0
I am struggling to understand the proof for integer parts of real numbers. I have used to mean less than or equal to because I could not work out how to type it in. I need to show that:
∃ unique n ∈ Z s.t. nx<n+1
The proof given is the following:
Let
A={k∈Z : kx}
This is a non-empty subset of R that is bounded above. Let α = sup A. There is an n ∈ A such that n > a - 1/2. n>α−1. Then nx and,since n+1>α+1>α, n+1̸∈A. Hence,n+1>x.
In particular I don't understand how A is bounded above, because I thought A = [k,∞) which has no upper bound. Where have I gone wrong?
∃ unique n ∈ Z s.t. nx<n+1
The proof given is the following:
Let
A={k∈Z : kx}
This is a non-empty subset of R that is bounded above. Let α = sup A. There is an n ∈ A such that n > a - 1/2. n>α−1. Then nx and,since n+1>α+1>α, n+1̸∈A. Hence,n+1>x.
In particular I don't understand how A is bounded above, because I thought A = [k,∞) which has no upper bound. Where have I gone wrong?
