Proof of Integral Relation for Scalar Functions with Gradient

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the integral relation for scalar functions with gradients, specifically for C² scalar functions f(x,y,z) and g(x,y,z) over an elementary region D. The relation states that the volume integral of the dot product of the gradients equals the surface integral of f times the gradient of g minus the volume integral of f times the Laplacian of g. Participants suggest using the product rule and integration by parts as foundational tools to approach the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of C² scalar functions
  • Familiarity with vector calculus concepts such as gradient, divergence, and curl
  • Knowledge of integration by parts in multiple dimensions
  • Experience with the Laplacian operator and its applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the product rule in vector calculus
  • Learn about the divergence theorem and its implications
  • Explore the properties of the Laplacian operator in three dimensions
  • Review examples of integral identities involving gradients and scalar functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying advanced calculus or vector analysis who seeks to understand integral relations involving scalar functions and their gradients.

Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm stuck on the following question.

Q. Let f(x,y,z) and g(x,y,z) be C^2 scalar functions. Let D be an elementary region in space and [tex]\partial D[/tex] be the closed surface that bounds D. Prove that:

[tex] \int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_D^{} {\nabla f \cdot \nabla g} } } dV = \int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_{\partial D}^{} {f\nabla g \cdot d\mathop S\limits^ \to } } - \int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_D^{} {f\nabla ^2 } gdV} } [/tex]

I've had practice doing some identity problems involving grad, div and curl. In those questions I've just started with the definition and have usually managed to get to the required result. However, I don't know where to start with this one. I can't think of any theorems which I could use to get things going. Can someone please help me get started? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a higher dimensional analog of integration by parts, which is the integral form of the differential product rule. See if a product rule helps you here.
 
Thanks for the hint StatusX, I'll see what I can come up with.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K