Proof of the Simple Theorem: x^2 >= 0 for Real x

  • Thread starter Thread starter Howers
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the theorem stating that for any real number x, x^2 is greater than or equal to zero. An incorrect proof is presented, suggesting that if x^2 were less than zero, then using x=3 leads to a contradiction, thus concluding x^2 must be non-negative. However, the proof is flawed because it incorrectly applies a specific case (x=3) to generalize the statement for all real numbers. The correct approach requires demonstrating that the assumption leads to a contradiction for all x, not just a single instance. This highlights the importance of rigorous logical reasoning in mathematical proofs, particularly in the use of reductio ad absurdum.
Howers
Messages
443
Reaction score
5
Theorem: Suppose that x is real, then x^2 > or = 0.
Incorrect Proof: Suppose not. Then x is real and x^2<0. Consider x=3. 9<0, a contradiction. Therefore x^2 >=0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry, but what exactly is the brain teaser at hand here?
 
Werg22 said:
I'm sorry, but what exactly is the brain teaser at hand here?
Why the proof is incorrect, even though seemingly it looks like it is.
 
I don't see how could this fool anyone... Given the assumption P -> -Q , --Q(3) does not give rise to P -> Q. One needs to show that the assumption P -> -Q gives rise to --Q (a statement for all x being considered, not just 3) and therefore conclude P -> Q by reductio ad absurdum.
 
Thread 'RIP Chen Ning Yang (1922-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Chen-Ning ( photo from http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~yang/ ) https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/18/science/chen-ning-yang-dead.html https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdxrzzk02plo https://www.cpr.cuhk.edu.hk/en/press/mourning-professor-yang-chen-ning/ https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/physics/about/awards_and_prizes/_nobel_and_breakthrough_prizes/_profiles/yangc https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/physics/people/_profiles/yangc...
Thread 'In the early days of electricity, they didn't have wall plugs'
Hello scientists, engineers, etc. I have not had any questions for you recently, so have not participated here. I was scanning some material and ran across these 2 ads. I had posted them at another forum, and I thought you may be interested in them as well. History is fascinating stuff! Some houses may have had plugs, but many homes just screwed the appliance into the light socket overhead. Does anyone know when electric wall plugs were in widespread use? 1906 ad DDTJRAC Even big...
Back
Top