Hi I'm trying to figure out the proof of why the gamma matrices are traceless. I found a proof at wikipedia under 'trace identities' here(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_matrices

(it's the 0'th identity)

and from the clifford algebra relation

[tex] \{\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu\} = 2\eta^{\mu \nu}[/tex]

one get that

[tex] \frac{\gamma^\mu \gamma^\mu}{\eta^{\mu \mu}} = I[/tex]

thus

[tex] Tr(\gamma^\nu) = \frac{1}{\eta^{\mu \mu}} Tr(\gamma^\nu \gamma^\mu \gamma^\mu) = \frac{1}{\eta^{\mu \mu}} Tr(\{\gamma^\nu, \gamma^\mu\} \gamma^\mu - \gamma^\mu \gamma^\nu \gamma^\mu)[/tex]

and here it seems like they set

[tex]\frac{1}{\eta^{\mu \mu}} Tr(\{\gamma^\nu, \gamma^\mu\} \gamma^\mu) = \frac{1}{\eta^{\mu \mu}} Tr(2 \eta^{\nu \mu} \gamma^\mu ) = 0.[/tex]

But why is this true?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Proof of traceless gamma matrices

Loading...

Similar Threads for Proof traceless gamma |
---|

A Does the Frauchiger-Renner Theorem prove only MWI is correct |

I A Proof of Kaku (8.18). |

A Gamma matrices |

I Representations of the Poincaré group: question in a proof |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**