- #1

- 560

- 2

## Main Question or Discussion Point

Hi I'm trying to figure out the proof of why the gamma matrices are traceless. I found a proof at wikipedia under 'trace identities' here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_matrices

(it's the 0'th identity)

and from the clifford algebra relation

[tex] \{\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu\} = 2\eta^{\mu \nu}[/tex]

one get that

[tex] \frac{\gamma^\mu \gamma^\mu}{\eta^{\mu \mu}} = I[/tex]

thus

[tex] Tr(\gamma^\nu) = \frac{1}{\eta^{\mu \mu}} Tr(\gamma^\nu \gamma^\mu \gamma^\mu) = \frac{1}{\eta^{\mu \mu}} Tr(\{\gamma^\nu, \gamma^\mu\} \gamma^\mu - \gamma^\mu \gamma^\nu \gamma^\mu)[/tex]

and here it seems like they set

[tex]\frac{1}{\eta^{\mu \mu}} Tr(\{\gamma^\nu, \gamma^\mu\} \gamma^\mu) = \frac{1}{\eta^{\mu \mu}} Tr(2 \eta^{\nu \mu} \gamma^\mu ) = 0.[/tex]

But why is this true?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_matrices

(it's the 0'th identity)

and from the clifford algebra relation

[tex] \{\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu\} = 2\eta^{\mu \nu}[/tex]

one get that

[tex] \frac{\gamma^\mu \gamma^\mu}{\eta^{\mu \mu}} = I[/tex]

thus

[tex] Tr(\gamma^\nu) = \frac{1}{\eta^{\mu \mu}} Tr(\gamma^\nu \gamma^\mu \gamma^\mu) = \frac{1}{\eta^{\mu \mu}} Tr(\{\gamma^\nu, \gamma^\mu\} \gamma^\mu - \gamma^\mu \gamma^\nu \gamma^\mu)[/tex]

and here it seems like they set

[tex]\frac{1}{\eta^{\mu \mu}} Tr(\{\gamma^\nu, \gamma^\mu\} \gamma^\mu) = \frac{1}{\eta^{\mu \mu}} Tr(2 \eta^{\nu \mu} \gamma^\mu ) = 0.[/tex]

But why is this true?

Last edited: