Proof of x^3+a^2x+b^2=0 roots question

  • Thread starter Thread starter DEMJR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Roots
DEMJR
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I want to prove x^3 + a^2x + b^2 = 0 has one negative and two imaginary roots if b \not= 0.

I know that it cannot have any positive real roots because a > 0 and b > 0 will always be the case.

I believe I can prove this using Descarte's Rule of Signs (which is in the same chapter of this problem).

Using the rule of Signs I get f(-x) = -x^3 -a^2x + b^2 = 0 which implies one negative root. Thus we conclude that we have two imaginary roots since we have to have a total of 3 roots and none can be positive.

However, I do am not sure if this is exactly what is meant when it says to prove it. Does this suffice?

Also, how would I begin to prove this algebraically?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You need to rule out the possibility of 3 real negative roots. Hint: sign of constant term.
 
Hey,

You have done well. :-)


The total number of roots (real + imaginary)should be 3.
And imaginary roots always occur in pairs (Why?)

So either the number of real roots is 1 or 3.

Remember the sign rule on f(x) tells you about the MAXIMUM no. of possible positive roots.


In your first step using the sign rule you derived that maximum no. of positive roots is 0.
So that means no positive roots exist.

Now using sign rule on f(-x)
You got maximum no. Of negative roots is 1.

So no. negative roots can be both 0 and 1.
But since we know that the equation should have atleast one real root,
You now know that number of negative roots is 1.

This is valid as long as both a and b are not zero.

You will have to check again for the case where a is 0 to get your entire answer
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top