Proof on a property of Riemann integrals

kidmode01
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let f be continuous on [a,b] and suppose that f(x) \geq 0 for all x Є [a,b]
Prove that if there exists a point c Є [a,b] such that f(c) > 0, then

\int_{a}^{b} f > 0


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Using my books notation,

Suppose P = {x0,x1,...,xn} is a partition of [a,b]. For each i = 1,...,n we let:
M_i(f) = sup\{f(x) : x \epsilon [x_{i-1},x_i]\}
m_i(f) = inf\{f(x) : x \epsilon [x_{i-1},x_i]\}

The upper sum of f with respect to P: U(f,P)
The lower sum of f with respect to P: L(f,P)

The upper integral of f on [a,b]: U(f) = inf{ U(f,P) : P is a partition of [a,b] }
The lower integral of f on [a,b]: L(f) = sup{ L(f,P) : P is a partition of [a,b] }

Suppose there exists a c Є [a,b] such that f(c) > 0 then
there exists a m_i(f) > 0
thus L(f,P) > 0

but then L(f) > 0, but since f is Riemann integrable:

0 < L(f) = U(f) = \int_{a}^{b} f

I know I'm kinda leaving out some details but is the outline alright? I have a feeling it's wrong since it was really short...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks pretty decent to me.
 
I should also include:

\Delta x_i = x_i - x_{i-1}

U(f,P) = \sum_{i=1}^n M_i \Delta x_i
L(f,P) = \sum_{i=1}^n m_i \Delta x_i
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top