Proof on Convergence of Sequence Given Info on Odd/Even Subsequences

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the convergence of a sequence given the limits of its even and odd subsequences. The original poster presents the problem of demonstrating that if the limits of the even-indexed terms and the odd-indexed terms of a sequence both approach the same limit L, then the overall sequence must also converge to L.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the definitions of convergence for the even and odd subsequences. There is a discussion about how to connect the individual limits of the subsequences to the overall limit of the sequence.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest taking the maximum of the two natural numbers associated with the limits of the subsequences as a potential approach. However, there is acknowledgment of a logical gap in transitioning from this idea to the desired conclusion about the overall sequence's limit.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the logical steps needed to complete the proof, indicating a need for clarity on the relationship between the subsequences and the overall sequence limit.

Heute
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given that limit of [itex]s_{2n}[/itex] is L and limit of [itex]s_{2n+1}[/itex] is L, prove that lim [itex]s_{n}[/itex] is also L.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



This seems very obvious: If the even terms of a sequence approach a number and the odd terms of that sequence approach the same number, then the sequence itself approaches that number.

But I'm not sure how to go about translating this into mathematics. I know from the definition of a limit that I can make the odd and even terms of [itex]s_{n}[/itex] as close to L as I want given a large enough n, but what I really need is to go from that to

given e>0 there exists natural number N so that n > N implies |[itex]s_{n}[/itex]-L|<e
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if lim s_2n=L and s_2n+1=L, then that definition of convergence for the odd and evens gives you two N's, right? How about taking the max of the two N's?
 
I thought of that - but I felt like there was still a logical leap from let N = max(N1, N2) to

n > N implies (what we're looking for)

Maybe I'm trying to be too pedantic.
 
If n> N= max(N1, N2), then both n> N1 and n> N2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K