I don't know what you mean by
Another question suggests you expand the brackets, then insert the original theorem which prooves that the whole statement is true?
but that is indeed how induction works.
So, first you need to show that it is true for
n = 1 (or if you want, for the slightly less trivial case
n = 2). Then you assume you have proven that n^3 - n is divisible by 3, and you try to show that (n + 1)^3 - (n + 1) is divisible by 3 as well.
Then usually one stops writing down the proof, but the reasoning is: it has been shown that
if it is true for
n = 1, it will be true for
n = 2. Also, it has been shown that
if it is true for
n = 2, it will be true for
n = 3; et cetera. We have shown explicitly that it holds for
n = 1. Therefore, it is true for
n = 2, hence for
n = 3, et cetera.
So first, check the statement for some low numbers (in principle,
n = 1 would suffice, but you can check it for 2 and 3 if you want). Then assume it is true for
n ("induction hypothesis") and try to prove it for
n + 1. This can indeed by done by working out the brackets and trying to get n^3 - n which is divisible by 3 by the induction hypothesis, plus something of which you can easily show that it is divisible by 3.