Proof that Algebraic Integers Form a Subring

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



The set ##\Bbb{A}## of all the algebraic integers is a subring of ##\Bbb{C}##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Here is an excerpt from my book:

"Suppose ##\alpha## an ##\beta## are algebraic integers; let ##\alpha## be the root of a monic ##f(x) \in \Bbb{Z}[x]## of degree ##n##, and let ##\beta## be a root of a monic ##g(x) \in \Bbb{Z}[x]## of degree ##m##. Now ##\Bbb{Z}[\alpha \beta]## is an additive subgroup of ##G= \langle \alpha^i \beta^j ~|~ 0 \le i < n##, ~ ##0 \le j < m \rangle##. Since ##G## a finitely generated, so is its subgroup ##\Bbb{Z}[\alpha \beta]##, and so ##\alpha \beta## is an algebraic integer. Similarly, ##\Bbb{Z}[\alpha + \beta]## is an additive subgroup of ##\langle \alpha^i \beta^j ~|~ i+j \le n+m-1 \rangle##, and so ##\alpha + \beta## is also algebraic."

I am having trouble seeing the two set inclusions, particularly because ##\Bbb{Z}[\alpha] := \{g(\alpha) ~|~ g(x) \in \Bbb{Z}[x] \}## and the degree of the polynomials in ##\Bbb{Z}[x]## is unbounded, while ##G## and the other set are built from (multivariable) polynomials of finite degree. Perhaps someone could make this more explicit. Also, what's the motivation for choosing ##n+m-1## as the upper bound for ##i+j##, other than the fact that it works?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The degrees in ##\mathbb{Z}[x]## maybe be arbitrary - I don't like unbounded here, as they are definitely finite for every element - but the algebraic expressions can be reduced. Let me first order your notation, as the double use of ##g(x)## is dirty. So let's stick with the first definition as minimal polynomial of degree ##m## with ##g(\alpha)=0##. Then for any element ##p(x) \in \mathbb{Z}[x]## we have ##p(\alpha) \equiv r(\alpha) \operatorname{modulo} g(\alpha)## with ##\deg(r) < m## by use of the Euclidean algorithm. So ##\mathbb{Z}[x]/\langle g(x) \rangle \cong \mathbb{Z}[\alpha]## has to be compared with ##G##, not the entire polynomial ring.

The minus one in ##n+m-1## comes in with the division, same as in the above with ##\deg(r) \leq m-1##.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top