Proof that Compact Subset of Metric Space is Bounded

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rasalhague
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bounded Compact
Rasalhague
Messages
1,383
Reaction score
2
Compact --> bounded

In lecture 8 of Francis Su's Real Analysis online lecture series, he has a proof that a compact subset of a metric space is bounded: Given a metric space (X,d), if A is a compact subset of X, then every open cover of A has a finite subcover. Let B be a set of open balls of radius r, one centered on each point of A. This is an open cover of A, so it has a finite subcover {Bi}. Let C be the set of distances between pairs of center points of the elements of the subcover {Bi}. Let s = max C. Then B(x,s+2r) is an open ball that includes A.

My question: why the 2? Isn't B(x,s+r) also an open ball that includes A? If u is a point in A, then

d(x,u) <= d(x,w) + d(w,u) <= s + r

where w is the center of an open ball in {Bi} that contains u.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


set up a horizonal row of spheres tangent to each other. then s=r*2*(k-1), k=number of spheres. the total diameter is s+2r=r*2*k=d. now draw B(x, d) and note: but where's x? is it in the center or somewhere else?
 
Last edited:


Ah, I see now. I made x be the center of one of the open balls in my proof, although I forgot to mention that. He must have been been taking x to be an arbitrary point of A. Thanks, xaos.
 
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top