I Proof that p is interior if p is not limit of complement

jamalkoiyess
Messages
217
Reaction score
22
Hello PF,

I am searching for a proof that I couldn't find on the internet.

Theorem: E in X a metric space. p in E. p is an interior point of E if and only if p is not a limit point of (E complement)'

Sorry for notations but I have no idea how to insert Latex here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jamalkoiyess said:
Hello PF,

I am searching for a proof that I couldn't find on the internet.

Theorem: E in X a metric space. p in E. p is an interior point of E if and only if p is not a limit point of (E complement)'

Sorry for notations but I have no idea how to insert Latex here.

What have you tried? Contradiction seems a promising method. (Didn't try yet)
 
Math_QED said:
What have you tried? Contradiction seems a promising method. (Didn't try yet)

I didn't even try... :sorry:
I will see if contradiction works.
 
jamalkoiyess said:
I didn't even try... :sorry:
I will see if contradiction works.

Well, it are the forum rules that you at least try yourself, and post what you tried.
 
  • Like
Likes jamalkoiyess
Math_QED said:
Well, it are the forum rules that you at least try yourself, and post what you tried.
So this is the proof I came up with, tell me if something is wrong:
## E \in X ##
Suppose that ##p \in \mathring{E} ## and ## p \in (E^c)' ##
Then ##\exists \quad \gamma>0 \quad s.t. \quad B_\gamma(p) \in E##
and ## \forall \quad r>0 \quad \exists q \in E^c \cap B_r(p) ##
now let ##r = \gamma ##
So ## q \in B_r(p) \subset E \quad and \quad q \in E^c ##
contradiction.
 
jamalkoiyess said:
So this is the proof I came up with, tell me if something is wrong:
## E \in X ##
Suppose that ##p \in \mathring{E} ## and ## p \in (E^c)' ##
Then ##\exists \quad \gamma>0 \quad s.t. \quad B_\gamma(p) \in E##
and ## \forall \quad r>0 \quad \exists q \in E^c \cap B_r(p) ##
now let ##r = \gamma ##
So ## q \in B_r(p) \subset E \quad and \quad q \in E^c ##
contradiction.

Yes, one small mistake ##B(p) \subseteq E## instead of ##B(p) \in E##. And you showed only one implication ( the other one is pretty much the same I think though)
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and jamalkoiyess
Back
Top