Proof that the eigenfunctions of a self-adjoint operator form a complete set.

will.c
Messages
374
Reaction score
1
I know this is a common and important fact, so I've been willing to accept it, but this has always been something that has been "outside the scope" of my quantum lectures. Does anyone have reference for a proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
will.c said:
I know this is a common and important fact, so I've been willing to accept it, but this has always been something that has been "outside the scope" of my quantum lectures. Does anyone have reference for a proof?

IMO, this is a postulate. The physical observables (which are often originated from symmetries) are described by the self-adjoint (or Hermitian) operators in the Hilbert space, and the eigenfunctions of the self-adjoint operators span the Hilbert space.

As in the popular text by Sakurai, the completeness of the set of eigenstates of a Hermitian operator is a postulate.

Cheers
 
The excellent book Mathematical Physics by Hassani has a proof of the spectral decomposition theorem for finite-dimensional vector spaces. As a corollary, a normal operator (one that commutes with its adjoint - more general than simply Hermitian) has eigenvectors that span the space.

To be honest, I don't know what additional assumptions/definitions you need for this to hold for infinite-dimensional spaces (if it even can at all). I think general self-adjoint operators on a Hilbert space don't even need to have eigenvalues. I'm not a mathematician though, so this is farther than I can go...
 
If you want to go a bit beyond Hassani (which I like) in terms of mathematical rigour, then look at the book Mathematics for Physics and Physicists by Appel. Chapter 14, Bras, kets, and all that sort of thing, uses a distributional rigged Hilbert space approach to treat the infinite-dimensional case.
 
Thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top