Proof that there exist such an element in Q

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element Proof
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


I'm asked to say whether the set Q,+,. is a field.
To be a field it must respect 8 conditions. And one of them is that there exists a unique element -x in Q such that x+(-x)=0 for all x in Q. I realize I have to prove the existence of -x but also its uniqueness. For the existence I don't know how could I approach it. For the uniqueness I'm sure that I could do it by absurd. That is by suposing that there exist more than one element -x that satisfies the same property and fall into a contradiction.
Can you get me started or help to get started for showing the existence?
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fluidistic said:
I'm asked to say whether the set Q,+,. is a field.

I realize I have to prove the existence of -x but also its uniqueness. For the existence I don't know how could I approach it.

Hi fluidistic! :smile:

(good sig! :biggrin:)

If Q is the rationals, then define the inverse of p/q as -p/q. :wink:
 
assume there is an element -x such that x + (-x) = 0

now assume there is an element y such that x + y =0
This implies y=-x therefore we conclude that

-x is the unique element
 
Ok thank you both, I think I got it. Wasn't that hard it seems!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top