Proof the Godel's Incompleteness Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter newton1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Theorem
AI Thread Summary
Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem asserts that any sufficiently complex axiomatic system, such as those encompassing natural numbers, is either inconsistent or incomplete, meaning some statements cannot be proven or disproven within the system. While one can add unprovable statements as axioms, this leads to further unprovable theorems, perpetuating the cycle of incompleteness. The theorem primarily applies to mathematical systems based on axioms and does not extend to experimental sciences like physics, which rely on empirical evidence. However, inconsistencies in a mathematical framework could jeopardize its application to physical theories, although no significant mathematical inconsistencies have been demonstrated. Overall, mathematicians accept the limitations of proof within these systems, acknowledging that not everything can be proven.
newton1
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
who can show me how to proof the Godel's Incompleteness Theorem ?
it that mean the system of mathematics will never be complate??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I doubt that anyone can show you how to prove Goedel's incompleteness theorem- its very long and very deep. There are a number of books written on it alone.

Yes, Goedel's theorem says that any system of axioms (large enough to encompass the natural numbers) is either inconsistent (in which case it's useless) or incomplete (in which case it's not perfect!).

Saying that a system is incomplete means there exist some theorem, statable in terms of the system which can be neither proven nor disproven. Of course, you could always add that theorem itself as an axiom but then you would have some other theorem that can be neither proven nor disproven.

One cannot prove, in absolute terms, that most of the systems used in mathematics are consistent- it is possible to prove, for example, that Euclidean geometry is consistent if and only if hyperbolic geometry is, or that Euclidean geometry is consistent if and only if algebra is, which is consistent if and only if the natural numbers are, which is true if and only if set theory is consistent...

Since there are one heckuva lot of things we don't know HOW to prove, most mathematicians are willing to live with the knowledge that they can't prove EVERYTHING!
 
i see...
are this theorem include the other science system like physics system??
 
It applies only to logical systems based on axioms. That includes all of mathematics. It does not apply to physics or other sciences that are based on experimental evidencel.

It is conceivable that, if a particular axiomatic system used to model physics were inconsistent, the mathematical foundation would be in trouble. The experimental evidence, of course, would still be valid. I will point out that there is no evidence that any important mathematical system is inconsistent.
 
what i mean is theoretical physics...
some theory was create by scientist before they have the experimental evidence
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
72
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
3
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
47
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top