Proof through Induction with Inequality

MitsuZero
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Original Problem Text:
http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/5882/problem3pn7.th.gif

Prove that, if n \in N and n \geq 2, then 2^(n^2) > n^(n).

Homework Equations



Some Hints:
*** (n-1)^(n-1) * 2^(n-1) = (2n - 2)^(n-1)
*** If n >= 2 then (2n - 2) >= n.
*** If n >= 1 then 2^(n) >= n.

The Attempt at a Solution



Using Induction:

For the base step, suppose that n = 2. This implies that 2^(2^2) = 16, and 2^(2)= 4, and 16 > 4, so the base step is proven true.
Suppose that n>2, and that the theorem has been proven for all smaller values of n.

Then we compute:
2^(n^2) > n^n
2^(n-1)^2 > (n-1)^(n-1)
***Multiply both sides by 2^(n-1)***
2^(n-1)^2 * 2^(n-1) > (n-1)^(n-1) * 2^(n-1)
2^(n-1)^2 * 2^(n-1) = 2^(n^2 - n) = 2^(n(n-1))
2^(n(n-1)) > (2n -2)^(n-1)
***Now here's the screwy part - I took the (n-1) root across the inequality. I have my doubts about the mathematical legality of such an operation. ***
2^(n) > 2n - 2
2n -2 \geq n (since n \geq 2)
2^(n) > n
2^(n^2) > n^(2)


Does this proof make any sense at all? Does it even remotely resemble a proof? I should point out that I'm using (n-1) in place of (n+1) because that's the way my professor did it.

Thanks a lot for any help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd try to use all hints they gave; they are usually given for a reason.
 
I believe I used just about all the hints my professor gave. Though whether I used them correctly is questionable.

For the first hint I multiplied both sides by 2^(n-1) in order to fit the form he gave -- i.e.
2^(n-1)^2 * 2^(n-1) > (n-1)^(n-1) * 2^(n-1)

For the second hint, I got rid of the (n-1) power on both sides (which itself is a questionable move), which gave the form:
2^(n) > 2n - 2

And finally, for the third hint, I related 2n - 2 > n to 2^(n) > 2n -2 > n.

Thanks again.
 
You are starting with the correct premise but not ending up with 2^(n^2) > n^(n)
 
It seems that we can do this without induction, using only the third hint since ...

2^{n^2} = 2^{n\times n} = (2^n)^n

It also seems to work for the case n = 1
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top