Proof with sets and elements. Am I going about this right?

Master0fN0thing
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Give an element-wise proof for the following: If A⊆B and B⊆C', then A ∩ C = ∅

Homework Equations


A is a subset of B (written A ⊆ B) if every element in the set A is also an element in the set B. Formally, this means that fore every x, if x ∈ A, then x ∈ B.
A ∩ B = { x ∈ U : x ∈ A and x ∈ B }.
A set that contains no elements is called an empty set, and is denoted by { } or ∅.
A is equal to B (simply written A = B) means that A and B have exactly the same members. This is expressed formally by saying, “A ⊆ B and B ⊆ A.”

The Attempt at a Solution


Because there is an equal sign in the "then" statement, I know I have to show two case if each side being a subset of the other. So here is what I have so far...

Proof:
Let U be the universe that contain the sets A, B, and C. Let A and B be subsets of U such that A ⊆ B and let B and C' be subsets such that B ⊆ C'.

Case 1:
We will show that A ∩ C = ∅. Let x ∈ A ∩ C. Then x∈U, x∈A, and x∈C. Since x∈A, it follows that x∈B by our hypothesis. Also by our hypothesis, since x∈B, x∈C'. Since x∈C, and x∈C', ...

and this is where I'm getting lost. How do I go proving from here its the empty set? At this point isn't this saying that x is every element? Or am I thinking about this totally wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you have is A\subseteq B \land B\subseteq C', assuming X' means complement of set X. You have shown that ..x\in C\land x\in C'..., by definition of complement, such a situation can never occur, therefore ...? You can convert your initial formula to something that only consists of conjuctions. If there is an identically false "sub-conjunction", then the entire conjunction is identically false.
If you haven't learned discrete math, yet, disregard what I said about converting things.

You have the right idea, a matter of analyzing the information you have gathered.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top