Proof x^2 - y^2 = (x + y)(x - y)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Melodia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Melodia
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello thanks for everyone who helped me on the previous implication proof, here's another problem I'm stuck on:
(Prove or disprove)
14PMD.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I think it has something to do with x^2 - y^2 = (x + y)(x - y), and here's my interpretation of "i)":
For every natural x and positive natural e, there exists one or more positive natural sigma so that if |x - y| is smaller than sigma then |x^2 - y^2| must be smaller than e, which works for any natural y.
But I'm lost at where to go next, since sigma could be any number, and with the absolute sign there won't be negative numbers. The same thing with "ii)" and "iii)", where "ii)" simply switched the ordering of the sets and "iii)" limits x and y to 1 and 2.
Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not working with the natural numbers, which are {0, 1, 2, 3, ...}. All of the variables are elements of the real numbers, with epsilon and delta being positive reals.

Also, this Greek letter -- \delta -- is lower case delta. This is lower-case sigma -- \sigma.

It looks to me like i) and ii) say the exact same thing, which is essentially the statement in terms of delta and epsilon that the function f(x) = x^2 is continuous at an arbitrary real number y. In short, these are saying that if x is close to y (within delta), then x^2 will be close to y^2 (within epsilon).
The third statement limits x and y to the interval [1, 2], but otherwise says the same thing as i) and ii).

The way these work is that you start off with |x^2 - y^2| < epsilon, and work with the left side of the inequality until you get |x - y| < some expression. You can use the factorization - x^2 - y^2 = (x - y)(x + y), and the fact that the absolute value of a product is the product of the absolute values of its factors. The trick is that when you divide by |x + y|, you need to have some idea of how large or small it will be.
 
Thanks! I got it after numerous tests of plugging in numbers.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top