Proofing the Limit of ##f(x)+g(x) = \infty##

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tsunoyukami
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Tsunoyukami
Messages
213
Reaction score
11
Suppose ##\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = \infty## and ##\lim_{x \to a} g(x) = c## where ##c## is a real number. Prove ##\lim_{x \to a} \big( f(x)+g(x) \big) = \infty##.

Proof Assume ##\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = \infty## and ##\lim_{x \to a} g(x) = c##. Then, by definition:

1) For every ##M > 0## there exists ##\delta_{1} > 0## such that ##0<|x-a|<\delta_1 \implies f(x)>M##.
2) For every ##\epsilon >0## there exists ##\delta_{2} >0## such that ##0<|x-a|<\delta_{2} \implies |g(x)-c|<\epsilon##.

We want to show that for every ##S>0## there exists ##\delta>0## such that ##0<|x-a|<\delta \implies f(x)+g(x)>S##.

Choose ##\delta = \min(\delta_{1}, \delta_{2})##.
Then ##0<|x-a|<\delta \implies f(x)>M## and Then ##0<|x-a|<\delta \implies |g(x)+c|<\epsilon \implies c -\epsilon < g(x) < c + \epsilon##.

Then ##f(x) + g(x) > M - \epsilon + c = S## and so, with ##S = M + c - \epsilon## we conclude ##\lim_{x \to a} \big( f(x)+g(x) \big) = \infty##.


Is this a valid proof? I'm not entirely sure if my argument is valid near the end. Any help is appreciated! Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems legit.
 
It's good, but there are a few things you can improve. g(x)+c appears to be a typo. Should be g(x)-c. I think it's not entirely clear what you're doing with S and M. It would add some clarity if you say "let S>0 be arbitrary" at the start of the proof, and then make it clear that you have chosen M and ε to be positive real numbers such that M-ε+c≥S (or =S). (It kind of looks like you let M and ε be arbitrary and then defined S by S=M-ε+c. That's not OK). That last line needs a "for all x such that |x-a|<δ" or a ##|x-a|<\delta~\Rightarrow~##.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top