Proofs in Linear Algebra: Countable Sets, Algebraic Numbers, and Fields

blaster
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Linear Algebra proof

I would appreciate any help with any of the foolowing:

1. Let C be a countable set. Prove that any linear well-ordered on C with the property that whatever c in C there are only finitely elements c` with c`<c, is unduced from the canonical order on N via a bijection N-> C. (N - natural no)

2. Prove that all algebraic numbers (all roots of polynomials with rational coefficients) form a countable subfield of C (complex).

3. Find a representation of the ring C[[x]] as an inverse limit of rings which have finite dimension over C.(complex).

4. Prove that the field Qp is uncountable. (Qp=field of fractions of Zp)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Number 4 is straight forward. You just need a surjection onto the reals (well in this case the non-negative reals which are also uncountable).

Hint. Given a number p any real number can be written in the form \sum_{j=n}^\infty a_j p^{-j} with 0 \le a_j &lt; p for some n\in \mathbb{Z}. Do you know any representations of Qp that is similar? The surjection doesn't not need any homomorphic properties.

Easier than a diagonal argument. Though there is also a diagonal argument.
 



1. To prove that any linear well-ordered on C with the given property is induced from the canonical order on N via a bijection, we need to show that there exists a bijection f: N -> C such that for any two elements n, m in N, n < m if and only if f(n) < f(m) in C.

First, we know that C is countable, which means that there exists a bijection g: N -> C. Let's define a new function h: N -> C such that h(n) = g(n+1). This function essentially shifts the elements of C by one, so that the first element of C is now mapped to the second element, the second element to the third, and so on.

Next, let's define a new function f: N -> C such that f(n) = g(1) if n = 0, and f(n) = h(n-1) if n > 0. This function essentially maps the first element of N to the first element of C, and then maps the remaining elements of N to the remaining elements of C in the same order.

Now, let's consider any two elements n, m in N. If n < m, then we know that f(n) = h(n-1) < h(m-1) = f(m) in C, since h is a bijection. And if f(n) < f(m) in C, then we can easily see that n < m, since f(n) = g(1) if n = 0, and f(n) = h(n-1) if n > 0.

Therefore, we have shown that there exists a bijection f: N -> C such that for any two elements n, m in N, n < m if and only if f(n) < f(m) in C. This proves that the linear well-order on C is induced from the canonical order on N via a bijection, as desired.

2. To prove that all algebraic numbers form a countable subfield of C, we first need to show that the set of all polynomials with rational coefficients is countable. This is because each polynomial can be represented as a finite sequence of rational coefficients, and the set of all finite sequences of rational numbers is countable.

Next, we know that the set of all roots of a polynomial with rational coefficients is finite. This
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top