Proofs involving subsequences.

  • Thread starter Thread starter WaterPoloGoat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proofs
WaterPoloGoat
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Which of the following sequences have a convergent subsequence? Why?

(a) (-2)n

(b) (5+(-1)^n)/(2+3n)

(c) 2(-1)n

Homework Equations


Cauchy Sequence
Bolzano-Weirstrass Theorem, etc.



The Attempt at a Solution



(a) The sequence I get is (-2,4,-8,16,-32,64...) We can get two subsequences, one comprised of (-2,-8,-32...) which diverges to -\infty, and (4,16,64...) which diverges to +\infty. So there are no subsequences that converge?

(b) The sequence I get here is something like (4/6, 7/8, 2/11, 9/14, 0, 11/20...) which seems to have no pattern. I don't know what to do here on out.

(c) (1/2, 2, 1/2, 2, 1/2,...) So all odd integers n converges to 1/2, and all even integers n converges to 2.

Here's my problem, other than being uncertain if I'm even doing this right: my professor wants rigorous proofs on everything we do in math, and I'm failing at writing adequate proofs. Where do I begin with a problem like this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the Bolzano Weierstrass Theorem? What conditions do you need to apply that theorem? Do any of your sequences fit that criteria?
 
The Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem simply states that "every bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence."

It doesn't really seem to help here because the sequences themselves don't seem to be bounded.
 
Really? The sequence that goes back and forth between 1/2 and 2 isn't bounded? What is the definition of a bounded sequence? Also for b), are you sure you wrote down your sequence correctly? As you have written it, the numerator goes back and forth between 4 and 6...
 
snipez, thank you for correcting my obvious error when it comes to problem (b).

And I know that the sequence from (c) is bounded, so the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem will help me there.

Do you have any suggestions on how to prove that these other subsequences converge (or don't)?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top