Proofs on Limit and Derivatives

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 7K views
kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0
1) Prove that f defined by
f(x)= e^(-1/|x|), x=/=0,
f(x)= 0, x=0
is differentiable at 0.


[I used the definition of derivative
f'(0)=lim [f(0+h)-f(0)] / h = lim [e^(-1/|h|) / h]
h->0 h->0
and I am stuck here and unable to proceed...]


2) Suppose lim (x->a) f(x) = L exists and f(x)>0 for all x not =a. Use the definition of limit to prove that L>0.

[when I draw a picture, I can see that this is definitely true, but how can I go about proving it?]

Thanks for your help!:smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For the second one, start with the definition of limit. Suppose L is less than zero, and show there must be some f(x) for x near a such that f(x) is quite close to L, and hence negative (in more formal terms of course)
 
kingwinner said:
1) Prove that f defined by
f(x)= e^(-1/|x|), x=/=0,
f(x)= 0, x=0
is differentiable at 0.


[I used the definition of derivative
f'(0)=lim [f(0+h)-f(0)] / h = lim [e^(-1/|h|) / h]
h->0 h->0
and I am stuck here and unable to proceed...]
Let k= 1/h so that you have
[tex]\lim_{k\rightarrow \infty} ke^-k[/itex]<br /> and use L'Hopital's rule.<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> <b>2) Suppose lim (x-a) f(x) = L exists and f(x)<u>></u>0 for all x not =a. Use the definition of limit to prove that L<u>></u>0.</b> </div> </div> </blockquote> You mean "limit as x goes to a of f(x)", not " limit of (x-a)f(x)" surely, since in the second case this is not true. Use 'indirect proof'. Suppose L< 0 and take [itex]\epsilon[/itex]= L/2 in the definition of limit.[/tex]
 
HallsofIvy said:
Let k= 1/h so that you have
[tex]\lim_{k\rightarrow \infty} ke^-k[/itex]<br /> and use L'Hopital's rule.<br /> <br /> <br /> You mean "limit as x goes to a of f(x)", not " limit of (x-a)f(x)" surely, since in the second case this is not true. Use 'indirect proof'. Suppose L< 0 and take [itex]\epsilon[/itex]= L/2 in the definition of limit.[/tex]
[tex] <br /> 1) But there is an absolute value |h|, letting k=1/h won't get rid of the absolute value, right?<br /> <br /> <br /> 2) Sorry, that's a typo...I have corrected it...<br /> How do you know how epsilon you are going to pick? I am personally having terrible trouble knowing what epsilon to pick to do this kind of proofs...[/tex]
 
Can someone please help me? I will be writing my finals tomorrow...