Propelling a Rod in Space with an Electric Motor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of using a large electric motor to propel a rod in space, highlighting challenges such as the inefficiency of rocket fuel production compared to the power generated. It emphasizes that while a vacuum eliminates air friction and gravity, it does not provide a propulsion mechanism, as there is no wind to utilize. The initial acceleration would require a rocket, but the ongoing energy generation from a megawatt-scale generator is questioned. Superconducting materials can reduce resistance but do not negate the electromagnetic forces that oppose motor rotation. Ultimately, the concept faces significant practical limitations, reinforcing the idea that there are no effortless solutions in this scenario.
EEstudentNAU
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Here is the situation. A large electric motor has a long rod attached at a 90º to the motor shaft and is accelerated at the end of the rod by something (rocket, fan, etc) and is in space (a vacuum). Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The production of the fuel for rocket would out-weigh the power created by the generator. There's no wind in space to push a fan. I think that the fact that it's in a vacuum only buys you freedom from the friction of "air" and gravity on the system.
 
The rocket would just be to get it started, to accelerate it to a high speed. I'm talking about an extremely large generator producing megawatts. The temperature in space is in the low kelvins, let's say 40k or less in the areas where we would be using this device, like in a deep crater on the moon that never receives sunlight. Using superconducting materials will eliminate resistance.
 
Using superconducting materials does not eliminate the electromagnetic forces that oppose the rotation of the motor. That's not resistance. There is no free lunch.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top