Proper distance integral limits seem wrong

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proper distance integral limits in cosmology, specifically the expression for proper distance dp(t) as ##\int_{t_e}^{t_0} c dt/a = \int_0^z c dz /H(z)##. The integral is correctly evaluated using the relation ##H = \dot a/a## and the transformation between time t and redshift z. A critical point is the need to switch the limits of integration due to the negative sign arising from the relationship ##da = -a^2 dz##. This clarification resolves confusion regarding the association of time t_0 with redshift z and emphasizes that the redshift is zero when the photon is emitted at time t_e.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological concepts such as proper distance and redshift.
  • Familiarity with integral calculus, particularly in the context of physics.
  • Knowledge of the Hubble parameter and its relation to the scale factor, specifically ##H = \dot a/a##.
  • Experience with transformations between time and redshift in cosmological models.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Hubble parameter and its implications in cosmology.
  • Learn about the relationship between scale factor and redshift in expanding universe models.
  • Explore integral calculus applications in physics, focusing on cosmological distances.
  • Investigate common misconceptions in interpreting cosmological equations and their limits.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding the intricacies of cosmological distance measurements and redshift interpretations.

deneve
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I've seen in some lecture notes that the proper distance dp(t) can be written as
##\int_{t_e}^{t_0} c dt/a = \int_0^z c dz /H(z)##

I can perform this integral ok using
##H =\dot a/a## and the fact that ##1 + z = 1/a(t_e)## but it requires associating the limits of the integration as te transforming to z and t0 to z= 0 - there is a minus sign which creeps in when you find dz/dt because da = - a2dz so the limits have to be switched. Thus they don't match as it appears when you read the integral.

I don't see how to interpret this because I feel it should be the other way round. That is t 0 should be associated with red shift z (that's what we measure today) and at time t = te the red shift should be 0 . Why am I wrong here?
 
Space news on Phys.org
If the photon is emitted at t_0, then its observed redshift will be zero. If it's emitted at t_e, then its observed redshift will be z.
 
Thank you Chalnoth that makes so much sense. I just couldn't get it right in my mind but this has settled the matter.

Kindest regards
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K