Proper Lorentz transformations from group theory?

AI Thread Summary
The group structure of Lorentz transformations arises from the fundamental properties expected of spacetime and inertial frames, ensuring that transformations between different frames are invertible. Linear transformations are necessary to maintain consistency across reference points, as non-linear transformations would depend on a specific reference point. The requirement for linearity also ensures that uniform motion of particles is preserved across frames. Additionally, the derivation of these transformations is linked to the homogeneity and isotropy of spacetime. Overall, these principles are essential for establishing the framework of special relativity.
xxxyyy
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
Physics news on Phys.org
The requirement that the set of Lorentz transformations forms a group comes from the basic properties that we expect of spacetime and inertial frames of reference.

The transformations must be linear, otherwise the transformation would depend on a particular reference point for ##(t, x, y, z) = (0,0,0,0)##.

There's a derivation from homogeneity and isotropy here:

http://www2.physics.umd.edu/~yakovenk/teaching/Lorentz.pdf
 
The group structure comes from the demand that transformations between different inertial reference frames should be invertible. The transformation from a frame to itself, i.e., doing in fact nothing, for sure is a symmetry and doing two transformations is also just a transformation from one inertial reference frame to another one.

The transformations should be linear because it should map any uniform motion of any point particle in one frame to such a motion in any other.

To get Minkowski space and the Poincare transformations you have to assume in addition also that any inertial observer describes his space as Euclidean.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top