Proper Lorentz transformations from group theory?

AI Thread Summary
The group structure of Lorentz transformations arises from the fundamental properties expected of spacetime and inertial frames, ensuring that transformations between different frames are invertible. Linear transformations are necessary to maintain consistency across reference points, as non-linear transformations would depend on a specific reference point. The requirement for linearity also ensures that uniform motion of particles is preserved across frames. Additionally, the derivation of these transformations is linked to the homogeneity and isotropy of spacetime. Overall, these principles are essential for establishing the framework of special relativity.
xxxyyy
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
Physics news on Phys.org
The requirement that the set of Lorentz transformations forms a group comes from the basic properties that we expect of spacetime and inertial frames of reference.

The transformations must be linear, otherwise the transformation would depend on a particular reference point for ##(t, x, y, z) = (0,0,0,0)##.

There's a derivation from homogeneity and isotropy here:

http://www2.physics.umd.edu/~yakovenk/teaching/Lorentz.pdf
 
The group structure comes from the demand that transformations between different inertial reference frames should be invertible. The transformation from a frame to itself, i.e., doing in fact nothing, for sure is a symmetry and doing two transformations is also just a transformation from one inertial reference frame to another one.

The transformations should be linear because it should map any uniform motion of any point particle in one frame to such a motion in any other.

To get Minkowski space and the Poincare transformations you have to assume in addition also that any inertial observer describes his space as Euclidean.
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top