Proper Time Interval: A Puzzler

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of proper time intervals in Special Relativity and the confusion regarding the perspective from which they are measured. Proper time is defined as the time interval between two events as measured by an observer who perceives the events occurring at the same point in space. The example of an observer on a moving train measuring the time for light to travel vertically is clarified; within the train's frame of reference, the observer remains at the same position during both events. It is emphasized that "point in space" is frame-dependent, meaning it varies based on the observer's reference frame. Understanding these nuances helps clarify the measurement of proper time in different contexts.
cdenne
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello. I'm having trouble figuring out from which perspective to measure the proper time interval for Special Relativity. In the textbook, the definition says it's "the time interval between two events measured by an observer who sees the events occur at the same point in space." But in the derivation of the formula for time dilation, the authors use an example with two observers, one on a moving train, one stationary on Earth. The observer on the train measures the proper time interval as being the time it takes for a beam from a flashlight to go up (directly vertical), bounce off a mirror on the ceiling directly above the observer and return to the flashlight. But as I see it, the observer is not viewing the two events (the light leaving the flashlight and the light returning to the flashlight) at the same point in space because they've moved down the track and are in a different position from when the light left the flashlight. If anyone can help me with this, I'd appreciate it. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know much Special Relativity, so sorry if I'm wrong.


cdenne said:
because they've moved down the track and are in a different position from when the light left the flashlight.

They've only "moved down the track" from the perspective of someone outside of the train. Within the train perspective, though, the flashlight's "position" is the same.
 
Thank you for your response. I thought about that as I was typing the post. "The same position in space" probably refers to the reference frame in which the two events take place. From that perspective, the observer on the train is still in the same position on the train when both events occur whereas the observer outside the train has moved by the time the second event occurs.
 
cdenne said:
In the textbook, the definition says it's "the time interval between two events measured by an observer who sees the events occur at the same point in space." .

Yes, you have figured it out (in post#3). It should say "by an observer who sees the events occur at the same point in space IN HIS FRAME OF REFERENCE".

There is no such thing as a "point in space" except as referenced against some OTHER point. That is "point in space" is frame dependent.
 
Great. Thank you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top