Proper time of an accelerating particle

alienslag
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A particle has a constant acceleration in a laboratory from 0 to 0.5c in 3 seconds. What time elapses for the particle (i.e. what is the proper time for the particle)? Hint: (you will have to integrate the proper time of the particle over the 3 seconds as measured in the laboratory frame).

Not sure how to approach this problem. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to figure out what the world line looks like. You know that d^2x/dt^2=a, where a is a constant and you can integrate that equation to find x as a function of t.

If by any chance you meant "constant proper acceleration" when you said "constant acceleration", it's more difficult to figure out what the world line looks like, but DrGreg derived it here, starting with post #13 and ending with a correction in post #28.
 
Last edited:
I am not sure I follow, could you please elaborate. X as a function of t is 1/2at^2 + vot +xo, but then how would I find the proper time of the particle from this relationship? Also I mean constant acceleration and not proper acceleration.
 
Do you know the definition of proper time? When you write it down, it's clear that you need to know the velocity as a function of time. (Position as a function of time is actually less useful). So what you need to do now is to find out the values of the constants in the equation you found. The boundary conditions that you stated in post #1 contain the information you need for that. The values of the constants depend on where you choose to put the origin of your coordinate system, so try to make a choice that simplifies the math as much as possible.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top