Time Elapsed Through Earth's Tunnel: Clock Drop Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter Count Iblis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time Tunneling
Count Iblis
Messages
1,858
Reaction score
8
Suppose someone drops a clock and it tunnels through the Earth. What time will have elapsed according to the clock when it emerges on the other side of the Earth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it only tunneling in space or can it also tunnel in time?
 
Time is one of those annoying issues in quantum mechanics. In non-relativistic QM, time isn't even a state of the system -- there is no operator that corresponds to measuring it. In relativistic QM, you've got a multiplicity of time and proper times are difficult to acertain without resorting to rather advanced applications of statistical mechanics and QM together. The basic idea is that time flow is always determined, in some sense, by the statistical state, and not just by the background structures or even just the dynamics.

Rather hazily, I might try to understand the situation via the Feynman paths method -- the initial state is propagated in spacetime via all possible routes, and the result of a measurement will have a probability distribution given by the interference possible. Assuming that the clock is a fundamental particle (it doesn't explode as it interacts with the Eath), and measures its proper time, the answer would be some inference pattern, in time.
 
As I understand it, and I claim no more authority then an interested amatuer, if the clock does true quamtum tunneling then it will reappear on the other side of the Earth instantly.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top