Proper way to cite your sources?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Newtime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sources
Newtime
Messages
347
Reaction score
0
...in a math research paper that is. I really have no idea. I'm assuming it's different than MLA. Is there a website or something out there that has the guidelines or is it different for each journal?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Probably different for each set of journals, or similar. Do you have a stylesheet that you could follow?
 
sjb-2812 said:
Probably different for each set of journals, or similar. Do you have a stylesheet that you could follow?

Stylesheet? I really don't have much of anything to go by. Fortunately, this isn't a huge deal since I have no real deadline but I would just like to have it look right when I get it to my adviser to look over. Is there no "general" way of doing things?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top