Properties and Elements of SO(4) Group in 4 Dimensions

jobinjosen
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
What are the properties of SO(4) group? , How this acts as a rotator in 4 dimensions?, What are the elements of Rotation matrix in a specific dimension among four dimensions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've been waiting for some kind of answer for this post too. I cannot answer the OP, but I'll throw more questions :smile:

When a rotation is carried out in three dimensions, there is an axis of rotation, that is a one dimensional subspace of the three dimensional space, and the rotation is in fact just a two dimensional rotation in the orthogonal complement of this axis. In analogy with this I might guess, that in four dimensions the one dimensional axis is replaced by a two dimensional subspace, that is then some kind of "axis" of rotation. Is this correct?

In analogy with SO(3), I might guess that SO(4)=\textrm{exp}(\mathfrak{so}(4)), where \mathfrak{so}(4) consists of those 4x4 matrices that are antisymmetric (satisty X^T=-X). However, these matrices depend only on 6 real variables, which is not enough to define two four dimensional vectors that would span the "axis space", so it seems I'm guessing something wrong.
 
jostpuur said:
In analogy with SO(3), I might guess that SO(4)=\textrm{exp}(\mathfrak{so}(4)), where \mathfrak{so}(4) consists of those 4x4 matrices that are antisymmetric (satisty X^T=-X).

This is true of SO(n) and so(n).

However, these matrices depend only on 6 real variables, which is not enough to define two four dimensional vectors that would span the "axis space", so it seems I'm guessing something wrong.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1110359&postcount=20 may be of interest to both you and jobinjosen.
 
Here are some more points regarding SO(4) group.

In SO(3) rotations, generator of rotation are components of Angular momentum (Lx, Ly, Lz) for rotation w.r.t corresponding axis.

Now, In SO(4), what are the generators of rotation?

They are components of Angular momentum (Lx, Ly, Lz) and components of Laplace Runge Lenz (LRL) vector (Ax, Ay, Az). Constancy of this LRL vector creates aditional symmetry. Am I correct?
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Back
Top