Properties of transition density functiions

mathy_girl
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I hope some of you know something about transition density functions. I'm wondering if there are some nice properties I can use...

Suppose p is a transition density function, defined as follows:

p(t,f,a|T,F,A) dF dA := Prob(F<f<F+dF, A<a<A+dA | F(t)=f, A(t)=a).

My question: what happens to p and its derivatives if we take limits of F and/or A to infinity? Is there a source where I can refer to for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a new concept for me, but I'll try if you help me understand. When you posted p(t,f,a|T,F,A) dF dA did you mean to write p(t,f,a|T,F,A, dF, dA)? It would seem to me that Lim(F+dF) = Lim(F) = infinity as F ---> infinity, and similarly for A. So my guess is p ---> 0 as both F and A approach infinity. You can see this more clearly if you define p as F<f<F+dF, A<a<A+dA, with weak inequality.
 
I ment to say that p is defined as the (transition) probability of t going to T, f going to F and a going to A. Multiplying with increments dA and dF is because p itself is a probability distribution, which has to be integrated (it does not have a value in a point).

Does this make it a bit more clear?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top