Properties of Univariate statistics.

zyQuzA0e5esy2y
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi PF, i have several questions about univariate statistics that doesn't seem to be covered in my notes or online, i hope the question is not redundant on the forums, but i ran a search and saw nothing.

In univariate statistics, you can have a PMF which is a discrete random variable (RV) and a PDF which is a continuous RV.

"We can estimate these quantities given a random sample of observations on a random variable, specifically, a random sample of n independently sampled observations on the random variable X is a set of random variable, each of which has the same distribution as X. That is, letting Fx(x) denote the CDF of Xi."

we can say that random variables, are independent and identically distributed (IID), since each observation has the same distribution, E(X) and variance are the same thus COV(Xi,Xj) = 0"

What happens if it was a PMF or is it not possible?

A normal distribution of method of moments tell us:
1st mom = E(X)
2nd mom = Variance
3rd mom = skewness
4th mom = Kurtosis
Does the skewness tell us the direction which the curve is skewed and if the E(X) and variance is on the left side or right side of the curve?

What is kurtosis and what does it tell us?
in my notes i have that the kurtosis tells me that it is a function of the first 4 moments which tells me the E(X), variance, skewness and kurtosis, but doesn't exactly tell me about kurtosis. could i possibly get an explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"What happens if it was a PMF or is it not possible?"
Same - if your sample is from a continuous distribution or discrete distribution (your only two distinctions) is immaterial: you can obtain the same information about moments, etc.

Roughly speaking (you can get more details by googling kurtosis)
Kurtosis gives one way to indicate how close the data's distribution is to a normal distribution

• Normal distributions have kurtosis equal to zero
• A distribution "flatter" than a normal has negative kurtosis
• A distribution more strongly peaked than a normal has positive kurtosis
 
Thank you very much, this actually helped. i tried googling kurtosis but didn't understand it as much.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top