mibaokula said:
...erm... please elaborate?
Okay.. but this probably isn't the right place. I am working on a website and trying to convert my notes and drawing over to .html and .jpg. But it amounts to quite a few pages and working time is limited.
Here is a crude first draft of abstract...
=== start of abstract text ===
BVC develops the assumption that at its unobservable, most primitive level the Universe is "simple" and deterministic; and that all observable phenomena are "complex" dynamic, emergent and persistent Processes.
Two psuedo-system primitives - S(1) "Beons" and S(0) "Void" are examined through geometry and thought experiment. Their minimalist "classical" physical feature sets leads to the emergence of behaviors (pulse/wave phenomena) in "BVspace" appearing to obey Huygen's Principle; and in so creating (from one perspective) a soft-solid "luminiferous aether" field or "H-field."
Distortions in H-field may produce persistent phonon-like processes, "quanta" and other multi-quanta "phenoms" which exhibit probabilistic, discontinuous behaviors. It is suggested that some of these "phenoms" correspond to "particles" in the Standard Model. Others
may be non-photon-interactive "dark matter".
[note: In my thought experiments, both cellular animation and the emergent behavior of "oscillons" are gingerly channelled.]
The interactive motion of these process-structures through H-space mimics both "particle mass" and a weak, additive "micro-gravitational" field-force. The number of quanta involved in a phenom is proportional to its "mass". As mass increase so does the strength and range of the micro-gravitational field-force.
A second form of "gravity" is suggested in conditions of high Beon densities (e.g., neutron stars and black holes) in BVspace. Dense regions create anisomorphic conditions cause regions of H-space (and the phenoms emergent from it) to "drift" along with BVspace It is essentially the same mechanism of DeSage gravitation.
This should be testable as "process inertia" should change at the limits of micro and macro gravitational fields.
=== end of abstract text ===
Simple kinematic (?) mechanics of massless, immutable bodies can be used to model the static, continuous "classical" behavior of Beons in BVspace. Beons cannot emit field-forces and so cannot be 'observed' and so must be dealt with geometrically or otherwise mathematically, through models and thought experiments.
The Idea of a general "Process physics" is proposed (basically fQM and GR) to deal with dynamic emergence, persistence and bifercation of "process" systems (any persistent system wherein a process or change of state is possible) and the relative 'motion' of any two such systems. Basically this covers anything but BVspace -- any "system" with more or less consistent 'physical' form and behavior that is not a Beon. Typically process systems are cyclic but not necessarily "periodic" relative to another cycle (e.g. a 'clock')
Quanta, photons and mass are all dynamic emergence phenomena and the values of h, c and m are discussed as being 'event limits' (with small ranges of variance) rather than absolute constants. For mass, the difference between 'rest' and 'moving' mass values is explained by their process motion).
Beons, not matter or processes, are not constrained by h or c and do not have mass, charge, color, et al. Beons are not "point" particles and have non-zero volume.
Waveforms naturally 'collapse' in BVspace because there is a limit to the number of density waves which can be superimposed in a region of BVspace before a qualitative change occurs (i.e., a Huygens pulse occurs.)
Maps of the "Territory Universe" based on observation must be probablistic because ALL possible observations cannot be made or known, even by a Perfect or LePlacean Observer" The Map is not the Territory. The qualities of a Map do not necessarily translate into actual physical features in the TU.
Discrete maps must have a minimal 'gauge'; and not all experimentally mapped phenomena are geometrically congruent. E.g, Single-point "location" map is incongruent with a two-point minimum "displacement" map. BVC does not find either Heisenburg Uncertainty or the inability to experimentally determine location and velocity simultaneously in any way 'weird'. "Weird" is giving more weight to classical mechanical theory and Galileo than to the evidence.
The M-M experiment doesn't not 'prove' the absence of 'aether': it goes proves the fallicity of "ponderous matter".. the Earth is not a poderous body apart from BVspace, but a set of waveforms occurring upon it.. No observable Aether Drift from this.
"Rest" is an emergent property of Process. There is no useful sense of "rest" in BVspace which is not arbitrarily introduced by an observer. Moreover neither the Earth or anything else in its proximate vicinity is "at rest" or represents a suitable "rest state", except relative to each other.
The following is a list of phenomena considered "fundamental" in current theory, but are considered emergent in BVC: matter, energy, gravitation, electromagnetism, weak force, strong force, entropy.
Other nearly fundamental standard model concepts BVC considered to be necessarily emergent: gaugeable time (clocks), gaugable space ("rigid" rods), time-space curvature, life, consciousness, intelligence.
The 'primitive' concepts basic to BVC are; Extension (infinite and ungauged), Duration (infinite and ungauged), the Void (no physical characteristics other than E and D), Beons (finite, immutable, eternal and "physically" unique -- no two Beons may occupy the same location in the Void.) Barring what I haven't considered (pssibly a lot, of course) everything else can be deduced from or is emergent from these primitive concepts.
A direct result from the nature of Beons and the Void is the conservation of Beon momenta; and indirectly, the conservation of emergent 'matter' and 'energy'.
Microgravity is a hint to how easy unifying GR and QM would be granting the BV Conjecture. But BVC compatibility with GR and SR can't be fully described without delving into the details of Process Systems ("phenoms") and their relative Process-Motion.
offered for what it's worth..
d.
) has been proposed by http://www.nbi.dk/~kleppe/Holger/holger.html , a respected (former?) string theorist, namely http://www.nbi.dk/~kleppe/random/qa/qa.html.
)
