Protect Your Intellectual Property: General Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter H0T_S0UP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General
AI Thread Summary
Posting theories in public forums can lead to a loss of control over intellectual property, as discussing ideas publicly may forfeit rights to claim originality. The date of disclosure can serve as a basis for originality claims, provided no one else has published similar ideas. For those interested in sharing personal theories, it's important to note that main forums do not allow such submissions. Instead, the Independent Research (IR) forum is available for posting research, but it requires adherence to strict guidelines. These guidelines include providing a review of existing work, detailing the originality of the new research, and explaining how it contributes to the field. Submissions that do not meet these criteria may be rejected and kept hidden from public view until accepted.
H0T_S0UP
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
this is my first post and I am new here so forgive me if this is in the wrong forum but I have a general question to ask and I couldn't find a suitable section in the forums. Here it goes: If I were to post some theories of mine, is my intellectual property protected if whatever I post so happens to be true? Ha perhaps I should go a Law and Order forum. But seriously I have found some mathematical patterns and I've also done lots of thinking about gravity and time and some of the conclusions I've came to yeild interesting results. However I don't want just guy taking my ideas and claiming them to be their own. Hope my question doesn't come off as defensive or arrogant I just don't want someone taking credit for my work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If one discusses one's theories in the public domain, one basically surrenders one's rights to control the work. One could claim originality only by virtue of the date of disclosure, and assuming that no one else has published the same idea.

Secondly, we do not permit personal theories in the main forums, but we have an Independent Research (IR) forum in which people may submit research for discussion. However, we have a rigorous set of criteria with which one must comply in order to have the submission accepted, e.g. one must provide a review of prior work in the field, and describe what is new and original about one's work and how it fills the holes in the existing body of knowledge. Failure to do so will result in rejection of the submittal, which is maintained in moderation out of the public view unless accepted.

See the IR Submission Guidelines here - https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=82301
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top