Proton=positron+neutron. what about law of conservation of mass?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between protons, neutrons, and positrons, questioning the implications for the law of conservation of mass. It is clarified that a proton is not made up of a positron and a neutron, and the process of β+ decay involves a proton decaying into a neutron, positron, and neutrino, which requires energy. This energy is sourced from the rest of the nucleus, addressing concerns about mass discrepancies. The mass of the decay products is indeed greater than that of the original proton, but this does not violate conservation laws due to the energy input required for the decay. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of particle interactions and conservation principles in nuclear physics.
vkash
Messages
316
Reaction score
1
neutron weighs higher than proton and you add a mass of positron which is around equal to to electron. so mass in right had side is much larger than that is LHS so is it disobeying Law of conservation of mass?
if it disobeys it and follow law of conservation of mass and energy.(E=mc2) then it doesn't seems to form any bond which causes release of energy and cause this extra mass.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A proton is not composed of a positron and a neutron. I think that you are thinking of β+ decay where a proton can gain energy and decay into a neutron, positron, and neutrino. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay#.CE.B2.2B_decay

Note that β+ decay requires energy for exactly the reason you mention, the mass of the products is greater than the mass of the reactants.
 
DaleSpam said:
A proton is not composed of a positron and a neutron. I think that you are thinking of β+ decay where a proton can gain energy and decay into a neutron, positron, and neutrino. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay#.CE.B2.2B_decay

Note that β+ decay requires energy for exactly the reason you mention, the mass of the products is greater than the mass of the reactants.

A i have said it does not seem to form an new bond so is this energy given by external source?
 
Yes, the external source being the rest of the nucleus containing the decaying proton. See the last two sentences of the section I referenced above.
 
DaleSpam said:
Yes, the external source being the rest of the nucleus containing the decaying proton. See the last two sentences of the section I referenced above.

thanks DaleSpam for your help.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top