Prove a function is not continuous

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f: ℝ² → ℝ defined by f(x,y) = xy/((x²) + (y²)) and f(0,0) = 0 is proven to be discontinuous using the epsilon-delta definition. The key approach involves converting to polar coordinates, where the limit as (x,y) approaches (0,0) simplifies to analyzing the behavior of |f(r, θ)| as r approaches 0 for various values of θ. It is established that |f(r, θ)| cannot be made arbitrarily small for certain θ, confirming the function's discontinuity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Epsilon-delta definition of continuity
  • Understanding of polar coordinates
  • Basic knowledge of limits in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with functions involving quotients
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of continuity in depth
  • Learn how to convert Cartesian coordinates to polar coordinates
  • Explore examples of discontinuous functions in multivariable calculus
  • Practice proving continuity and discontinuity using epsilon-delta proofs
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on multivariable functions, and educators looking for examples of discontinuity proofs using the epsilon-delta method.

ssayan3
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Using the epsilon-delta definition, prove that the function f:R^{2} \rightarrow R by f(x,y) = xy/((x^{2}) + (y^{2})), and f(0,0) = 0 is not continuous.

The Attempt at a Solution


I just really have no clue how to set up a delta-epsilon proof for functions that involve quotients. I went ahead and set up as much delta information as I could, but I have no idea how to set up the epsilon part:

|x-x_{0}|<\delta, |y-y_{0}|<\delta, and |(x-x_{0})+(y-y_{0})|<\delta (Those are supposed to be x (initial) and y (initial) for the delta info... I couldn't get LaTex to set them up correctly...)

Can someone give me a couple of good pushes in the right direction? :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For problems like these, I recommend changing to polar coordinates. That way, (x,y)-> (0,0) becomes just r-> 0 no matter what \theta is. To show that this function is not continuous you only have to show that |f(r, \theta)| cannot be made arbitrarily small ("&lt; \epsilon") for small r for at least some values of \theta. For this particuar problem I think you will find that easy.
 
Hm, I'm just not sure why I didn't think of that before! Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K