Prove A is invertable for all values of theta

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter delgeezee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theta
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the invertibility of the matrix A for all values of $$\theta$$ and finding its inverse $$A^{-1}$$. The context includes mathematical reasoning and exploration of properties related to determinants and matrix operations.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the determinant of A as $$\det(A) = 1$$, which is non-zero, suggesting that A is invertible.
  • Another participant emphasizes that since $$\det(A) \ne 0$$ for all $$\theta$$, this is sufficient to prove invertibility.
  • A different perspective suggests that since $$\sin(\theta)$$ and $$\cos(\theta)$$ are real for all $$\theta$$, the elements of A remain real, supporting the conclusion about the determinant.
  • One participant proposes that the expression for $$A^{-1}$$ does depend on $$\theta$$, but highlights that the determinant being constant and non-zero is enough to conclude invertibility.
  • Another participant introduces a geometric interpretation of A as a rotation matrix, stating that the inverse can be derived from the property of rotation matrices, specifically that $$A(\theta)A(-\theta) = I$$.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the determinant being non-zero is sufficient to show that A is invertible for all $$\theta$$. However, there are varying approaches and interpretations regarding how to express this proof and the role of $$\theta$$ in the inverse matrix.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the best way to articulate the proof of invertibility, indicating that there may be multiple valid approaches to the problem. The discussion reflects a range of mathematical reasoning and interpretations without reaching a definitive consensus on a single method.

delgeezee
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Show that matrix A is invertible for all values of $$ \theta$$; then find $$A^{-1}$$ using
$$A^{-1}= \frac{1}{det(A)}adj(A)$$

A = [table="width: 200"]
[tr]
[td]cos$$ \theta$$[/td]
[td]-sin$$ \theta$$[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]sin$$ \theta$$[/td]
[td]cos$$ \theta$$[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

----------

By cofactoring along the 3rd row, I find det(A) = (1)*($$ cos^2\theta + sin^2\theta$$) =1 , which is a nonzero and implies that A is invertible.
To get the Andjuct of A or Adj(A) , I form a cofactor matrix C and transpose it.

Adj(A) = $$C^{T}$$ =

A = [table="width: 200"]
[tr]
[td]cos$$ \theta$$[/td]
[td]sin$$ \theta$$[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]-sin$$ \theta$$[/td]
[td]cos$$ \theta$$[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

which also happens to be $$A^{-1}$$
My Question is how am I suppose to prove A is invertible for all Values of $$/theta$$?

My gut tells me I am suppose to state that $$A^{-1}= \frac{1}{det(A)}adj(A)$$ does not depend on $$\theta$$. Is there a more definitive way of showing A is invertible for all Values of $$\theta$$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
delgeezee said:
My Question is how am I suppose to prove A is invertible for all Values of $$/theta$$?

You found that \det(A) \ne 0. That's all you need to do.
 
I agree that you've done enough, but to show that the determinant is non-zero for all $\theta$, I would say something along the lines of the following.

$\forall \theta \in \mathbb{R}$ it follows that $\sin (\theta ) \text{ and} \cos( \theta ) \in \mathbb{R}$. Every element in $A$ is in $\mathbb{R}$ so operations involving those elements are also in $\mathbb{R}$ and the result you found holds for all $\theta$.

Not the best wording maybe, but that's the general idea.
 
delgeezee said:
My Question is how am I suppose to prove A is invertible for all Values of $$/theta$$?

My gut tells me I am suppose to state that $$A^{-1}= \frac{1}{det(A)}adj(A)$$ does not depend on $$\theta$$. Is there a more definitive way of showing A is invertible for all Values of $$\theta$$?
$A^{-1}= \begin{bmatrix}\cos\theta & \sin\theta &0 \\ -\sin\theta & \cos\theta & 0 \\ 0&0&1 \end{bmatrix}$, which does depend on $\theta$. But $\det A=1$, and the constant $1$ is nonzero and does not depend on $\theta$. That is all you need, to conclude that $A$ is invertible for all $\theta.$
 
delgeezee said:
Show that matrix A is invertible for all values of $$ \theta$$; then find $$A^{-1}$$ using
$$A^{-1}= \frac{1}{det(A)}adj(A)$$

Another way of finding $A^{-1}$ in this case (I don't know if you have covered it) is to consider $$A(\theta)= \begin{bmatrix}\cos\theta & -\sin\theta &0 \\ \sin\theta & \;\;\cos\theta & 0 \\ 0&0&1 \end{bmatrix}$$ as a rotation around the $z$-axis by angle $\theta$. Then, by geometric considerations $A(\theta)A(-\theta)=A(0)=I$, so $$A^{-1}(\theta)=A(-\theta)=\begin{bmatrix}\cos(-\theta) & -\sin(-\theta) &0 \\ \sin(-\theta) & \;\;\cos(-\theta) & 0 \\ 0&0&1 \end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}\;\;\cos\theta & \sin\theta &0 \\ -\sin\theta & \cos\theta & 0 \\ 0&0&1 \end{bmatrix}$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
749
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K