Determining Galois extension based on degree of extension

  • Thread starter Thread starter PsychonautQQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree Extension
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether a field extension L over K, with a degree of 2 and characteristic 0, is a Galois extension. Participants explore the implications of the degree of the extension and the properties of minimal polynomials in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the degree of the extension and the splitting of minimal polynomials. They consider the implications of having a root in L and whether the polynomial must factor linearly. Questions arise regarding the separability of the minimal polynomial and the nature of roots within the extension.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the properties of minimal polynomials and their roots. There is an exploration of the conditions under which the extension can be considered Galois, with some participants offering reasoning related to linear independence and the structure of the polynomial.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the assumption that the characteristic of K is 0, which influences the separability of the minimal polynomial. There is also a focus on the implications of the degree of the extension being 2 and how that affects the roots of the polynomial.

PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


If Char(K) = 0 and [L:K]=2, is L:K a galois extension?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


My gut is saying yes because if [L:K]=2 then it seems that any polynomial in K[x] with a root in L should split in L[x]. Something about how some hypothetical minimal polynomial of some element m call it m(x) where L[x] is isomorphic to the quotient field K[x]/m(x), then K(u) is isomorphic to L where given the conditions that [L:K] =2 then deg(m(x)) = 2 and so if L has one of the roots of m(x) then that means that m(x) factors linearly because it only has degree 2 and thus all the roots are in L thus the extension is normal. Am I leaving anything important out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've thought along the same lines. More formal we can choose an element ##u \in L-K##. Then ##\{1,u\}## is ##K-##linear independent and ##\{1,u,u^2\}## is not. This means we can write ##u^2=\alpha \cdot 1 + \beta \cdot u## which means ##u## is a root of ##x^2- \beta x - \alpha##.
Now we can write down both solutions ##u## and ##v## and see that ##v \in K(u)##, i.e. our minimal polynomial splits and is separable. (Why?)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PsychonautQQ
fresh_42 said:
I've thought along the same lines. More formal we can choose an element ##u \in L-K##. Then ##\{1,u\}## is ##K-##linear independent and ##\{1,u,u^2\}## is not. This means we can write ##u^2=\alpha \cdot 1 + \beta \cdot u## which means ##u## is a root of ##x^2- \beta x - \alpha##.
Now we can write down both solutions ##u## and ##v## and see that ##v \in K(u)##, i.e. our minimal polynomial splits and is separable. (Why?)
Our minimal polynomial is separable because K is given to have Characteristic 0, and our minimal polynomial splits because both of it's roots are in K(u). Thanks!
 
PsychonautQQ said:
Our minimal polynomial is separable because K is given to have Characteristic 0, and our minimal polynomial splits because both of it's roots are in K(u). Thanks!
One can also see it directly: If ##u## were a double root, then ##u=-\frac{\beta}{2} \in K## which we ruled out. And with ##u=-\frac{\beta}{2}-\sqrt{sth.}\, , \,v=-\frac{\beta}{2}+\sqrt{sth.}## we get ##v=-u-\beta \in K(u)##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K