Prove:β (heat pump) is always less or equal to β(Carnot HP)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mek09e
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat pump Pump
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the coefficient of performance (β) for a heat pump is always less than or equal to that of a Carnot heat pump (β(Carnot)). The explanation begins with the definition of β in terms of the heat exchanged with the cold (QC) and hot (QH) reservoirs, applying the first law of thermodynamics. The second law is then used to relate QC and QH to the temperatures of the reservoirs (TC and TH), establishing the maximum possible β. A Carnot cycle, operating between TC and TH, is shown to achieve this maximum β, confirming that β is always less than or equal to β(Carnot). This foundational understanding is crucial for thermodynamics applications.
mek09e
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello All!

My professor in thermodynamics showed us the proof of the Carnot theory using integrals and a temp vs. entropy plot for a heat engine cycle. We haven't actually learned about entropy yet, so can someone help me understand how this translates into the coefficient of performance β for a heat pump? We were given the rule that β≤β(Carnot) for heat pumps and refrigerators, but I can't prove this is true on my own. Any explanation is appreciated :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Don't you have a textbook?

Basically, you start from the definition of the coefficient of performance and use the 1st law to write it in terms of ##Q_C## and ##Q_H##, the heat coming from the cold reservoir and that going to the hot reservoir, respectively. Then, you use the 2nd law to translate ##Q_C## and ##Q_H## to ##T_C## and ##T_H##. This gives you the highest ##\beta## possible according to the 2nd law. Then you prove that a Carnot cycle working between ##T_C## and ##T_H## has a value of ##\beta## that is the highest possible. Therefore, ##\beta \le \beta(\mathrm{Carnot})##.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top