Prove Bloch's Theorem from Integral Schrodinger's Eqn

  • Thread starter Thread starter king vitamin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Theorem
king vitamin
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
486
Reaction score
245
Prove Bloch's Theorem from Integral Schrodinger's equation (sorry! tried to make an umlaut and accidentally hit the keyboard shortcut for posting, any way to edit titles?)

Homework Statement



If a scattering potential has the translation invariance property V(\mathbf{r} + \mathbf{R}) = V(\mathbf{r}), where \mathbf{R} is a constant vector, prove that the scattering solutions \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)} of the integral form of the Schrodinger equation are Bloch wave functions, since they satisfy the relation

<br /> \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R}) = e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{R}}\psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}).<br />

Homework Equations



The integral form of Schrodinger's equation is given as:

<br /> \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}) = N e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}} - \frac{m}{2 \hbar^2 \pi} \int d^3 r&#039; \frac{\exp(\pm ik|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}&#039;|)}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}&#039;|}V(\mathbf{r}&#039;)\psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}&#039;)<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm don't seem to be getting anywhere here. I begin by computing:

<br /> \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R}) = N e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot (\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R})} - \frac{m}{2 \hbar^2 \pi} \int d^3 r&#039; \frac{\exp(\pm ik|\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R} - \mathbf{r}&#039;|)}{|\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R} - \mathbf{r}&#039;|}V(\mathbf{r}&#039;)\psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}&#039;)<br />.

The first term is fine of course. In the second term, we obviously need to use the translation property of the potential, and we need to make the integral look like the original Schrodinger's equation for \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}). So I change variables \mathbf{r}&#039; \rightarrow \mathbf{r}&#039; + \mathbf{R} (Jacobian is trivial for shifts):

<br /> \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R}) = N e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot (\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R})} - \frac{m}{2 \hbar^2 \pi} \int d^3 r&#039; \frac{\exp(\pm ik|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}&#039;|)}{|\mathbf{r}- \mathbf{r}&#039;|}V(\mathbf{r}&#039;)\psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}&#039;+\mathbf{R})<br />

where I have used the translation property of the potential to shift it. This is where I'm stuck. I can't really work with the exact wave function, but the equation as it is seems to be impossible to work with because the arguments of the Green's function and the wave function don't match. If I could even get a hint as to the idea behind this it would really help.

I can also write:

<br /> \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{R}) = e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{R}} \left[N e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}} - \frac{m}{2 \hbar^2 \pi} \int d^3 r&#039; \frac{\exp(\pm ik|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}&#039;|)}{|\mathbf{r}- \mathbf{r}&#039;|}V(\mathbf{r}&#039;)e^{-i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{R}}\psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}&#039;+\mathbf{R}) \right]<br />
where I want to show
<br /> e^{-i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{R}}\psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}&#039;+\mathbf{R}) = \psi_{\mathbf{k}}^{(\pm)}(\mathbf{r}&#039;)<br />.
This would work if the wavefunction were a momentum eigenstate (replace k by p/hbar), but I don't think this is true in general (k is defined as k^2 = 2mE/\hbar^2).
 
Last edited:
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top