Prove by Beta and Sigma limit definition

kidia
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Please any help.

Use the symbols \beta and \sigma definition of limit to prove that limit (x,y)\Longrightarrow(0,0)x+y/x\x^2+y\y^2=0
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think beta/sigma definitions are a 2D analogue to epsilon/deltas? I'm afraid I can't find any reference to them, you'll have to define them please.
 
You want to show that for a given \beta >0, you can find a number \sigma >0 such that when the distance from the origin of the point (x,y) is smaller than \sigma, then this implies that

\frac{x+y}{x^2+y^2}&lt;\beta[/itex] <br /> <br /> So we kinda want to find a function \sigma(\beta). <br /> <br /> The statement &quot;the distance from the origin of the point (x,y) is smaller than \sigma&quot; is written mathematically as \sqrt{x^2+y^2}&amp;lt;\sigma<br /> <br /> There are many solutions but here&#039;s a hint based on one:<br /> <br /> Use the fact that x+y \leq (x^2+y^2)^2 coupled with the hypothesis \sqrt{x^2+y^2}&amp;lt;\sigma to define a function \sigma(\beta).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top