Prove by Induction: 13n - 6n Divisible by 7

  • Thread starter Thread starter pauliedangerous
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
pauliedangerous
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
can anyone help me with this - my notes make this slightly confusing and struggling to finsih it.

prove by induction that fo0r every positive integer (n) that 13n - 6n is divisible by 7

ive got so far:

(n = 1) = 13(1) - 6(1) = 7 which is divisible by 7

n(k+1) = 13(k+1) - 6(k+1)
= 13(1).13(k) - 6(1).6(k)
= 13.13k - 6.6k

then stuck as my notes with examples give calculations tht i don't usnderstand where they come from il post them if you can explain it.

example from my notes:

Question 8: Where n is an integer prove that the expression 7n – 2n is exactly divisible by 5.
Hint: 7k+1 – 2k+1 can be written as 7k.71 – 2k.21 i.e. 7k.7 – 2k.2

Question 8: It holds for P(1) = 71 – 21 = 5 which is exactly divisible by 5.
Inductive step: Consider P(k+1) assuming P(k) is true.
P(k +1) = 7k+1 – 2k+1
= 71.7k - 21.2k
= 7.7k - 2.2k
= 7k + 6.7k - 2k - 2k splitting up the terms 7.7k and 2k
= (7k - 2k) + 6.7k - 2k and (7k - 2k) = P(k)
= P(k) + 6.7k - 2k
= P(k) + 5.7k + 7k - 2k splitting up the term 6.7k
= P(k) + 5.7k + P(k) 7k - 2k is P(k)
This expression and thus P(k+1) is exactly divisible by 5 since both expressions P(k) and 5.7k are exactly divisible by 5.

P(1) is true and P(k)→P(k+1), so by the principle of induction P(n) holds for all n.


thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have:
p(k+1) = 13(k+1) - 6(k+1)
= 13(1).13(k) - 6(1).6(k)
= 13.13k - 6.6k

Note 13x = 12x + x and 6y = 5y + y. Let x = 13k and y = 6k.

You can continue as:
p(k+1) = 12 13k + 13k - (5 6k + 6k) = 12 13k - 5 6k + (13k - 6k) = 156k - 30k + p(k)
...

You should pay attention to your parentheses, e.g. 7k + 1 is different from 7(k+1).
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top