Prove continuouty of 1/x (delta-epsilon)

  • Thread starter Thread starter wglmb
  • Start date Start date
wglmb
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I've been trying to do this for a while but I'm not really getting anywhere. Hints would be much appreciated!

Homework Statement



Prove that the function g(x)=1/x is continuous on \latexbb{R}\smallsetminus\{0\}, but cannot be defined at the origin 0 in such a way that the resulting function is continuous on \latexbb{R}.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Just the first part for now - proving continuity on \latexbb{R}\smallsetminus\{0\}.
They want an \epsilon-\delta proof. Here we go...


Let a,b\in\latexbb{R}\smallsetminus\{0\}.
Let \delta=\epsilon>0.
Then \forall a\in\latexbb{R}\smallsetminus\{0\} and \forall\epsilon>0 we have:
\mid a-b\mid<\delta\Rightarrow\mid g(a)-g(b)\mid=\mid \frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b}\mid=\mid\frac{b-a}{ab}\mid<\frac{\delta}{\mid ab\mid}
Now I take the case where b is such that \mid a-b\mid>1 and we have...
\frac{\delta}{\mid ab\mid}<\delta=\epsilon
So it's proven for such b (I think?)

Now I have no idea what to do about b such that \mid a-b\mid<1. Or was splitting it into two cases a bad idea? Am I going anywhere useful here?
Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not a good idea to split cases. You will have to take a different delta to handle the situation at once. The thing that gives some trouble, is the denominator |ab|. We want to make sure this is small. Now, a is fixed (since we want to prove continuity at the fixed point a), so in fact the only trouble is 1/|b|, which we want to make small. This is the same as |b| being not too big. This can be arranged by choosing the right delta, which will depend on a. In that way, |a-b|<delta implies that b will be close to a, and after some fiddling you will be able to estimate 1/|b|.
I hope this helps you. You can also take a look at this thread.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top