Prove/Disprove: Inverse Function g(x)=x-\frac{1}{x},x>0

AI Thread Summary
The function g(x) = x - 1/x for x > 0 is being analyzed for its one-to-one nature and inverse. A tutor suggested it is one-to-one, but the user found two solutions for g^-1(x), raising questions about potential mistakes in their reasoning. The user derived the inverse function, indicating that it simplifies to (x + √(x^2 + 4))/2. The discussion also touches on the relationship between the domain of a function and the range of its inverse. The analysis concludes that g(x) is indeed one-to-one, confirming the tutor's assertion.
haha1234
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove/Disprove following function being one-to-one.If yes,find its inverse.

g(x)=x-\frac{1}{x},x>0

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


My tutor said that it is one-to-one,but I found that the are two solutions for g-1(x).
Are there any mistakes?
g(x)=x-\frac{1}{x},x>0
x=g-1(x)-\frac{1}{g^{-1}(x)}
[g-1(x)]2-xg-1(x)-1=0
g-1(x)=(x\pm\sqrt{x^2-4(1)(-1)})/2
THANKS
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
x>0
so
$$\frac{x\pm\sqrt{x^2+4}}{2}$$
reduces to
$$\frac{x+\sqrt{x^2+4}}{2}$$
keep in mind f is increasing that is
$$\mathrm{f}(x+h)-\mathrm{f}(x)=h \left( 1+\frac{1}{x(x+h)}\right)>0$$
so
f(x+h)=f(x)
implies x=x+h
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I fixed the broken LaTeX near the bottom of post #1. It didn't render correctly because tags were mixed in some itex script.
 
haha1234 said:

Homework Statement



Prove/Disprove following function being one-to-one.If yes,find its inverse.

g(x)=x-\frac{1}{x},x>0

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


My tutor said that it is one-to-one,but I found that the are two solutions for g-1(x).
Are there any mistakes?
g(x)=x-\frac{1}{x},x>0
x=g-1(x)-\frac{1}{g^{-1}(x)}
[g-1(x)]2-xg-1(x)-1=0
g-1(x)=(x\pm\sqrt{x^2-4(1)(-1)})/2
THANKS
How are the domain of a function and the range of the inverse of that function related ?
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top