Prove Equivalent Norms: Norm 1 & Norm 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the equivalence of two norms, ||.||1 and ||.||2, within a vector space. The original poster attempts to establish the relationship between the two norms through the existence of constants that relate them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of norm equivalence, discussing the properties of open balls in relation to the norms. Questions about definitions and the nature of equivalent norms are raised, with some participants reflecting on their understanding of the concepts involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their definitions and interpretations of equivalent norms. There is a sense of progression as some participants express clarity on their definitions, while others continue to explore the implications of these definitions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of proving a mathematical property without providing complete solutions. There is an acknowledgment of previous discussions on related topics, such as equivalent metrics, which may influence their reasoning.

Oster
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Prove that two norms ||.||1 and ||.||2 are equivalent if and only if there exist 2 constants c and k such that c*||x||1 <= ||x||2 <= k*||x||1 for all x in the concerned vector space V.

Attempt-> Equivalence implies a ball in norm 1 admits a ball in norm 2 and vice versa. For normed linear spaces, I know that B(x,r) = x + r*B(0,1).

So, a ball with respect to norm 1, B1(x,r), admits a ball in norm 2 with say radius 's'.

Using the normed linear space property, I can conclude that for a vector 'y' in V, if ||y||2 < s
then ||y||1 < r.

I don't know where I am going =(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Oster! :smile:

What is your definition of equivalent norms?
 
HI! I got it =D

My definition was that for every open ball with respect to norm 1, there existed an open ball w.r.t norm 2 contained in it and vice versaaaaaaa!
 
Converse was easy pffff.
 
That is the same as saying that a sequence converges in one norm if and only if it converges in the other.
 
In another thread last night you were studying the analogous result for equivalent metrics. This follows from that result, as the norm induces a metric.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K