Prove f continuous given IVP and 1-1

  • Thread starter Thread starter luxade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous Ivp
luxade
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f : (-1, 1) → ℝ. f satisfies the intermediate value property and is one-to-one on (-1, 1). Prove f is continuous on (-1, 1)

The Attempt at a Solution


I was thinking that the IVP and one-to-one implies that f should be strictly monotonic and that a strictly monotonic one-to-one function is continuous. Both of these seem very intuitive to me and yet I have no idea how to do the rigorous proof. For example if f is not strictly monotonic then it seems there would be a contradiction in f one-to-one but does that follow directly? Since you don't know anything else about the function..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know it's funny, on wikipedia both versions of the Intermediate Value Theorem require f to be continuous as a hypothesis, are you sure your question isn't asking you to prove f^{-1} is continuous?
 
Poopsilon said:
You know it's funny, on wikipedia both versions of the Intermediate Value Theorem require f to be continuous as a hypothesis, are you sure your question isn't asking you to prove f^{-1} is continuous?

The question as stated is correct. It states that f satisfies the intermediate value property: the result of the theorem rather than the theorem itself.
 
Ah yes, I apologize. This problem is tough. You won't be able to prove it's uniformly continuous, thus recall that proving point-wise continuity allows delta to depend not only on epsilon but also on the point at which you are trying to prove continuity.

Thus choose a point x \in (-1,1) and use the IVP to find another suitable point y (this choice will depend on epsilon). Think about what to do with |f(x) - f(y)| and with |x-y|. Then consider an arbitrary point w with a certain bound on |x-w| and its implications for |f(x) - f(w)|; I believe proving these implications will require applying the IVP and one-to-one in coordination, but I haven't formally worked out the details.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top